Grupen v. Thomasville Furniture Industries
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Judge.
The basis for plaintiff’s motion for rehearing is G.S. 1A-1, Rule 60(b) which provides that a court may relieve a party from a final judgment on the basis of “newly discovered evidence which by due diligence could not have been discovered in time to move for a new trial under Rule 59(b).” (See Rule XX, 6, of the Rules of the North Carolina Industrial Commission.) A motion for further hearing on the grounds of introducing newly discovered evidence rests in the sound discretion of the Industrial Commission. Mason v. Highway Commission, 273 N.C. 36, 159 S.E. 2d 574 (1968) ; Owens…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Austin Joseph Ryan v. United States Lines CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Campbell v. American Foreign SS CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
- Harris v. FRANK L. BLUM CONSTRUCTION COMPANYCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- Mason v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Owens v. STANDARD MINERAL COMPANYCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hogan v. Cone Mills Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- Harris v. Family Medical CenterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- Hogan v. Cone Mills Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- Cole v. ColeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- Wall v. N.C. Department of Human Resources: Division of Youth ServicesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.