Benfield v. Troutman
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Judge.
Plaintiff first contends .“[t]he trial court erred in denying plaintiff’s motion for further hearing in order to present rebuttal testimony.”
The motion for a further hearing in which to present rebuttal testimony was addressed to the sound discretion of the deputy commissioner and his ruling thereon is not reviewable on appeal absent a showing of abuse of discretion. Harris v. Construction Co., 10 N.C. App. 413, 179 S.E. 2d 148 (1971); Mason v. Highway Commission, 273 N.C. 36, 159 S.E. 2d 574 (1968).
Plaintiff did not show in his motion the nature of the rebuttal testimony or…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Harris v. FRANK L. BLUM CONSTRUCTION COMPANYCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- Mason v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Hales v. North Hills Construction Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
3Cited by3 opinions
- Yelverton v. Kemp Furniture Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- Hardin v. A. D. Swann Trucking Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
- Fowler v. Chaircraft, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979