Legal Opinion

Benfield v. Troutman

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 14, 1973No. 73221C84PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

Plaintiff first contends .“[t]he trial court erred in denying plaintiff’s motion for further hearing in order to present rebuttal testimony.”

The motion for a further hearing in which to present rebuttal testimony was addressed to the sound discretion of the deputy commissioner and his ruling thereon is not reviewable on appeal absent a showing of abuse of discretion. Harris v. Construction Co., 10 N.C. App. 413, 179 S.E. 2d 148 (1971); Mason v. Highway Commission, 273 N.C. 36, 159 S.E. 2d 574 (1968).

Plaintiff did not show in his motion the nature of the rebuttal testimony or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Harris v. FRANK L. BLUM CONSTRUCTION COMPANYCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Mason v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Hales v. North Hills Construction Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Yelverton v. Kemp Furniture Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Hardin v. A. D. Swann Trucking Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  3. Fowler v. Chaircraft, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API