Legal Opinion

Kerr v. Snowden

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 16, 1914No. Civ. No. 1473PublishedCited by 1 opinion

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

Action in ejectment. The case was tried before a jury which rendered a verdict for plaintiff. Judgment followed. Defendants moved for a new trial, in support of which they offered a statement of the case. The motion was denied, and this appeal is from the order denying the same.

The land, one hundred and sixty acres in area, is situated in Imperial County. The complaint, filed April 12, 1909, alleged that on January 28, 1907, plaintiff was seized in fee of “that certain 160 acres of land, . . . embraced in Desert Land Entry No. 3024 and in said Desert Land Entry described as the SE % of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Johnston v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1862
  2. De Godey v. GodeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Sacramento Savings Bank v. HynesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Sauer v. MeyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Conlan v. QuinbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1876

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Certain Parcels of Land SituateDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API