Legal Opinion

Sauer v. Meyer

California Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1890No. 13699PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Luis Obispo County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Belcher, C. C.

This is an action of ejectment. The court below gave judgment for the defendant, and the plaintiff appeals on the judgment roll.

The facts of the case, as found by the court, are in substance as follows: In November, 1883, the plaintiff leased the demanded premises for the term of ten years and one month from the first day of December following, the rental during the last five years of the term to be “forty dollars per month, payable in gold coin on the first of each and every month, in advance.”

The lease provided that at the expiration or sooner determination thereof the lessees…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hestres v. BrennanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Sacramento Savings Bank v. HynesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ciapusci v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
  2. Universal Milk Co. v. WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Mossi v. FairbanksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  4. Budaeff v. HuberCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. Herbert v. GrahamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API