Legal Opinion

Legge v. Greig

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1994No. S-5787PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRYNER, Justice, Pro Tem.

Patricia Legge appeals the trial court’s order denying her motion to confirm a settlement agreement in a civil action. Albina Greig responds that Legge has no right to appeal the issue, because Legge voluntarily dismissed her case. We find that Legge has failed to adequately brief the voluntary dismissal issue and accordingly conclude that she has waived her right to appeal.

I. FACTS

Patricia Legge (Legge) joined her husband, Earl, and their son, James, in a suit seeking compensation from Albina Greig for personal injuries Earl and James sustained *607in an…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cooksey v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Petersen v. Mutual Life Insuarance Co. of New YorkAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Dickerson v. GeiermannAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Singh v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Kiester v. Humana Hospital Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Sykes v. Melba Creek Mining, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Alaska Interstate Construction, LLC v. Pacific Diversified Investments, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Timothy W. v. Julia M.Alaska Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Robinson v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Chijide v. Maniilaq Ass'n of KotzebueAlaska Supreme Court · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API