Legal Opinion

Kiester v. Humana Hospital Alaska, Inc.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided December 24, 1992No. S-4361PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COMPTON, Justice.

W. Scott Kiester contends that he is entitled to damages resulting from the allegedly wrongful denial of his application for surgical privileges by Humana Hospital Alaska, Inc. (Humana). According to Kies-ter, Humana failed to follow its bylaws in denying Kiester’s application, thereby violating his right to due process of law. The superior court dismissed Kiester’s claims on Humana’s motion for summary judgment. We reverse.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In December 1984 Kiester applied for medical and surgical privileges at Humana. Humana’s Medical Staff Bylaws…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Doctor Robert Sosa v. Board of Managers of the Val Verde Memorial HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  2. Garrow v. Elizabeth General Hospital and DispensarySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  3. Miller v. Eisenhower Medical CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Sea Lion Corp. v. Air Logistics of Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Ritter v. Board of CommissionersWashington Supreme Court · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Valley Hospital Ass'n v. Mat-Su Coalition for ChoiceAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Sadler v. Dimensions Healthcare Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  3. Reeves v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Spindle v. Sisters of Providence in WashingtonAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Egan v. ST. ANTHONY'S MEDICAL CENTERSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API