Calwood Structures, Inc. v. Herskovic
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROTH, P. J.
Appellant entered into an oral contract with respondent for certain home improvements on the latter’s behalf and allegedly com pleted the same at a total cost in labor and materials of some $25,000. Respondent reimbursed appellant or paid directly to suppliers about $17,300 of this amount. When appellant sought to recover the balance plus a 10 percent supervisory fee, his original and amended complaints were met with general demurrers sustained by the trial court, ultimately resulting in dismissal of the suit. The basis for the trial court’s action was that the requirement…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lewis & Queen v. N. M. Ball SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Vitek, Inc. v. Alvarado Ice Palace, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1973
- City Lincoln-Mercury Co. v. LindseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Southfield v. BarrettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Bennett v. HayesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Asdourian v. ArajCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Arya Group, Inc. v. CherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Hinerfeld-Ward, Inc. v. LipianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Schoenmann v. Bach Construction, Inc. (In Re Segovia)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · 2008
- Asdourian v. ArajCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985