Arya Group, Inc. v. Cher
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MALLANO, J. *
Arya Group, Inc. (Arya) appeals from the orders dismissing its action against the respondents herein, Cher, the Inshallah Trust, Janet L. Bussell, Tutt Design Group, Inc. (Tutt) and Hawthorne Savings, F.S.B., after demurrers to Arya’s second amended complaint were sustained without leave to amend. (Code Civ. Proc., § 581, subd. (f)(1).) Arya contends the trial court’s rulings constituted an abuse of discretion because the factual allegations in Arya’s second amended complaint show Arya “is entitled to relief under legal theories of breach of contract, promissory estoppel,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mirkin v. WassermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Lewis & Queen v. N. M. Ball SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Commodore Home Systems, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Hydrotech Systems, Ltd. v. Oasis WaterparkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Asdourian v. ArajCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Malek v. Blue Cross of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Chambers v. KayCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Hinerfeld-Ward, Inc. v. LipianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Standard Pacific Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Adir International v. The Travelers Indemnity CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.