Legal Opinion

Hinerfeld-Ward, Inc. v. Lipian

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 1, 2010No. B211257PublishedCited by 5 opinions

[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

EPSTEIN, P. J.

The appellants in this litigation are homeowners who embarked on a major residential home improvement project. They appeal from a judgment in these cross-actions in favor of their general contractor that awarded them only $1,000 in damages on their negligence cause of action. They contend the trial court erred in enforcing an oral contract in violation of statutory requirements that the contract be in writing; that the contractor was not entitled to an award of statutory attorney fees; and that the trial court erred in striking testimony by one of the homeowners about…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Coalition of Concerned Communities, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Diamond Multimedia Systems, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Asdourian v. ArajCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Cicairos v. Summit Logistics, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ing Bank, Fsb v. Chang Seob AhnDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2010
  2. David Alberts v. Bridge Housing Corporation, et al.District Court, S.D. California · 2026
  3. David Alberts v. Bridge Housing Corporation, et al.District Court, S.D. California · 2026
  4. Morris v. O'Neill CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. Redlich v. Reliance Management Group CA1/1California Court of Appeal · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API