Bennett v. Hayes
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THE COURT. *
Upon certification by the superior court, we ordered transfer of the appeal in this case, pursuant to section 911 of the Code of Civil Procedure, in order to settle an important question of law, to wit, whether an automobile repair dealer’s failure to give his customer a written estimate prior to repair of the customer’s automobile, as required by section 9884.9., subdivision (a), of the Business and Professions Code, bars any recovery for work performed. With certain additions and modifications, we have adopted the excellent opinion of the appellate department of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- City Lincoln-Mercury Co. v. LindseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Tiedje v. Aluminum Taper Milling Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
- Fong v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
3Cited by17 opinions
- Fair v. BakhtiariCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Scibek v. LongetteNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
- I-5 Truck Sales & Service Co. v. UnderwoodCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
- Zhadan v. Downtown Los Angeles Motor Distributors, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1979
- Junho Hyon v. SeltenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.