Legal Opinion
Kilpatrick v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided July 30, 2015No. Court of Appeals No. 14CA1003PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
JUDGE TAUBMAN
{1 In this workers' compensation action, we reject the principal argument of claimant, Brian Kilpatrick, that his right to equal protection of the law was violated because district court judges must disclose their financial contributions, while workers' compensation prehearing administrative law judges (PALJs), and administrative law judges (ALJs) and members of the Industrial Claim Appeals Office (Panel) do not. Because we conclude that those ALJs and Panel members are required to disclose their financial contributions, we further conclude that claimant's right to…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Vaccaro v. American Family Insurance GroupColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
- Belle Bonfils Memorial Blood Center v. District Court In & For the City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- City of Florence v. PepperSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
- Support, Inc. v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of the ColoradoColorado Court of Appeals · 1998
- Industrial Claim Appeals Office v. OrthSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- 85 Sanchez v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2017
- Ackerman v. City and County of DenverColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
- v. Industrial Claims Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2019
- Campaign Integrity Watchdog v. Colorado Secretary of StateColorado Court of Appeals · 2025
- People v. SalgadoColorado Court of Appeals · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.