Legal Opinion

Industrial Claim Appeals Office v. Orth

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 14, 1998No. 97SC671PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Martinez

This workers’ compensation action concerns the scope of authority granted to a Prehearing Administrative Law Judge (“PALJ”) by the Workers’ Compensation Act. See §§ 8-40-201 to 8-47-203, 3 C.R.S. (1997). We granted certiorari to determine whether a PALJ may approve a settlement agreement that purports to close a workers’ compensation case pursuant to section 8-43-204, 3 C.R.S. (1997), and whether such approval is a final order subject to review.1 We hold that a PALJ possesses jurisdiction to approve a workers’ compensation settlement agreement, and that such approval is final for purposes of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Woodsmall v. Regional Transportation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  2. State Engineer v. Castle Meadows, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  3. Rodriguez v. SchuttSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  4. Christie v. Coors Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  5. Padilla v. Industrial Com'n of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Davison v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
  2. Walton v. StateSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  3. Colorado Department of Labor & Employment v. EsserSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  4. Specialty Restaurants Corp. v. NelsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2010
  5. Kisselman v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2011

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API