Legal Opinion
City of Florence v. Pepper
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided October 2, 2006No. 05SC812PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Martinez
The Respondent, Booth Pepper, brought this action in 2008 against the City of Florence, the Industrial Claim Appeals Office ("ICAO"), and the City's insurer, the Colorado Intergovernmental Risk Sharing Agency ("CIRSA"), seeking damages for injuries allegedly sustained from an incident that occurred in 2001 while Pepper was acting in his capacity as a volunteer reserve police officer for the City of Florence. The administrative law judge ("ALJ") dismissed Pepper's claim on summary judgment motion, finding that his claim was barred by section 8-40-202(1)(a)(I)(A), C.R.S. (2001). This provision…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Martin v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
- People v. JamesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1972
- Lakeview Associates, Ltd. v. MaesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- Colorado State Board of Medical Examiners v. JorgensenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
- Bynum v. KautzkySupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Specialty Restaurants Corp. v. NelsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2010
- People v. SteenSupreme Court of Colorado · 2014
- Jenkins v. Panama Canal Railway Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2009
- Board of County Commissioners of the County of San Miguel v. Colorado Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
- Department of Transportation v. City of Idaho SpringsColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.