Legal Opinion
Aeroplate Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided August 5, 2005No. 05-736CPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHRISTINE O.C. MILLER, Judge.
Before the court after argument are the parties’ cross-motions for judgment on the administrative record in this post-award bid protest. Plaintiff challenges the contracting official’s ability to reject a bid as nonresponsive based upon knowledge that the apparent low bidder, which submitted a facially valid bid bond, will not be able to secure the performance and payment bonds from the original surety post award. By order dated July 15, 2005, the court granted plaintiffs request for interim injunctive relief pending this ruling. Aeroplate Corp. v. United…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Amoco Production Co. v. Village of GambellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Pgba, LLC v. United States, and Wisconsin Physicians Service Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Fmc Corporation and Monsanto Company v. The United States, and Rotem Fertilizers Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Contracting, Consulting, Engineering LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Blue & Gold Fleet, LP v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Dyonyx, L.P. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- GTA Containers, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Klinge Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.