Legal Opinion

Matrix-Churchill v. Springsteen

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 28, 1984No. 83-478, 83-479PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The issue in this case concerns successor corporation liability and grows out of a products liability action filed by plaintiff Springsteen against Matrix-Churchill and the Cyril Bath Company, Inc., under the Alabama Extended Manufacturer's Liability Doctrine. Matrix-Churchill cross-claimed seeking a declaratory judgment as to which of the defendant corporations would be liable to Springsteen should he prevail upon his claim. The trial court, sitting non-jury, found that Matrix-Churchill would be liable and dismissed the Cyril Bath Company, Inc., (Cyril Bath), directing an entry of final…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ray v. Alad Corp.California Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Turner v. Bituminous Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Ramirez v. Amsted Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  4. Krivo Industrial Supply Company and Morgan Precision Parts, Inc. v. National Distillers and Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  5. Charles Travis and Jean Travis v. Harris Corp., Harris-Intertype Corporation, Sheridan Division and Bruno MacHinery CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Prattville Memorial Chapel v. ParkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  2. Turner v. Wean United, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  3. Brown v. Economy Baler Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  4. Asher v. KCS Intern., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  5. AM. NONWOVENS v. Non Wovens EngineeringSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API