Legal Opinion

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Nooney

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 6, 1922No. 23,722PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Wyandotte district court,tdivision No. 2; Frank D. Hutchings,, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

This was an action brought by the U. S. Fidelity & Guaranty Company upon an indemnity bond given by Theodore T. Grabske, to indemnify the plaintiff against loss on a contract of suretyship. It was decided that the answer of the defendant did not state a defense, .and from that ruling Grabske appeals. '

From the pleadings it appears that Albert H. Nooney entered into a contract with the board of education of Kansas City to furnish material and install a heating apparatus in a high-school building. He procured the Guaranty Company to give…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stevens v. InchSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  2. Fossan v. GibbsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  3. Underwood v. VilesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Talbott v. NibertSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
  2. Estate of Boller v. BollerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1952
  3. Cherry v. JoyceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950
  4. Macksville State Bank v. EhrlichSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  5. Soeken v. HartwigSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API