Legal Opinion
Dobbs-Weinstein v. Vanderbilt University
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided January 20, 1998No. 3:95-0560PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
NIXON, Chief Judge.
Pending before the Court in the above-styled matter is Defendant Vanderbilt University’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 35), to which Plaintiff Idit Dobbs-Weinstein filed a Response (Doc. No. 43). For the reasons outlined below, the Court grants the Motion and dismisses Plaintiffs state law claims.
I. Background
Plaintiff Dobbs-Weinstein alleges discrimination in employment on the basis of her gender and national origin in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and the Tennessee Human Rights Act,…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Idit Dobbs-Weinstein, Plaintiff-Appellant/ Cross-Appellee v. Vanderbilt University, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Klaus v. Hilb, Rogal & Hamilton Co. of OhioDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2006
- Thompson v. City of MemphisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Ross v. City of MemphisDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2005
- Preston v. Berendsen Fluid PowerDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.