Legal Opinion
Preston v. Berendsen Fluid Power
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided December 22, 2000No. 5:99CV138PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERT HOLMES BELL, District Judge.
This is a civil action brought by Plaintiff Susan K. Preston against her employer, Berendsen Fluid Power, Inc., alleging gender based discrimination in violation of the Equal Pay Act, 29 U.S.C. § 206 et seq. and Michigan’s Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act, M.C.L. § 37.2202(l)(a). This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s motion for summary judgment.
i.
Plaintiff Susan K. Preston (“Preston”) was hired by Defendant Berendsen Fluid Power, Inc. (“Berendsen”) in April 1995 as an Inside Sales Representative (“ISR”). Berendsen is a distributor of fluid…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Williams v. City of LondonDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2003
- Neis v. Fresenius USA, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2002