Legal Opinion

Coe v. Smith

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1849PublishedCited by 5 opinions

ERROR to the Marion Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Perkins, J. —

Debt, by Smith, administrator upon the estate of Philip Sweetser, deceased, against Isaac Coe, upon the following instrument, the declaration containing no common count.

“I promise to pay Philip Sweetser, or order, 500 dollars, to be paid, one-third in one, one-third in two, and one-third in three years from this date, value received, Dec. 16, 1842. t Isaac Coe, (Seal).”

The defendant pleaded three pleas, which were substantialty alike, and stated “that before and at the time of the execution of said writing obligatory, it was agreed, by and between the said defendant and the said…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. M'Millan v. VanderlipNew York Supreme Court · 1815
  2. Cunningham v. GwinnIndiana Supreme Court · 1837
  3. Howk v. PollardIndiana Supreme Court · 1841
  4. Milnes v. VanhornIndiana Supreme Court · 1846

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Durland v. PitcairnIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Cox v. DavisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Hickman v. RaylIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Swank v. Nichols' Adm'rIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
  5. McCormick v. DonahueIndiana Court of Appeals · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API