Legal Opinion

Hickman v. Rayl

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1877PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Erom the Switzerland Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBiddle, J.

This action is founded on a promissory note, made by the appellants to the appellee.

The answer to the complaint is as follows:

“ That said note was executed by the defendant Silas Hickman, as principal, and by the defendant George W. Hickman, as surety for the said Silas, in consideration of the rent of a farm owned by the plaintiff, which he rented to the defendant Silas Hickman, by articles of agreement made between the said plaintiff and said Silas, on the same day the note was executed, and as a part of the same agreement, by which articles the plaintiff', in consideration of the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. President of the Bank of Columbia v. HagnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  2. Fitchburg Cotton Manufactory Corp. v. MelvenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1818
  3. Wilson v. MartinCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845
  4. Adams v. CosbyIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Cromwell v. WilkinsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1862

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Miller v. ReadyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Bundrant v. BoyceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1910
  3. Crouch & Son v. ParkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Voss v. Capital City Brewing Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  5. Wood v. Ridgeville CollegeIndiana Supreme Court · 1888

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API