Legal Opinion

Milnes v. Vanhorn

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 1846PublishedCited by 4 opinions

ERROR to the Steuben Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDewey, J.

Debt. The declaration alleges that, on, &c., a writing obligatory was made between the parties, by which the plaintiff agreed to put up for the defendant “a steam-engine in good working order, and to run or cause to run the same for one week, and then to leave it in good working order;” for which the defendant agreed to pay the plaintiff 350 dollars — 150 dollars when the engine should be started, and 200 dollars in three months thereafter with interest; that it was further agreed, that the defendant should board and lodge the workmen of the plaintiff while they were engaged in erecting the…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lomax v. BaileyIndiana Supreme Court · 1846
  2. Woodruff v. DobbinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1845
  3. Adams v. WilloughbyNew York Supreme Court · 1810

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Coe v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1853
  2. Coe v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1849
  3. Hawkins v. RobertsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1923
  4. Coe v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1848

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API