Legal Opinion

Howk v. Pollard

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1841PublishedCited by 5 opinions

ERROR to the Cass Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBlackford, J.

This was an action of debt brought by Pollard, assignee, &c., on a sealed note for the payment of money.

Three pleas: 1, Actio non. The note was given in consideration, that the payees would assign to the defendant certain certificates for three tracts of land, each tract containing eighty acres. Averment, that the tracts of land did not contain eighty acres each, &c. Wherefore, &c. 2, Actio non. The consideration of the note was as stated in the first plea. Averment, that the payees did not assign the certificates for the tracts of land containing eighty acres each. Wherefore, &c. 3, As to…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Tyler v. AndersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Campbell v. FrankemIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Cox v. ReynoldsIndiana Supreme Court · 1855
  4. Coe v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1849
  5. Collart v. FiskWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API