Legal Opinion
State v. Bristor
Court of Appeals of Kansas
Decided May 3, 1984No. 55,283PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Meyer, J.:
This is an appeal by the State from the trial court’s order suppressing the results of a blood alcohol test (BAT) which was administered to defendant-appellee Randy Bristor shortly after his arrest for driving under the influence of alcohol.
At approximately 11:00 p.m. on the evening of July 30, 1982, defendant was driving in Dodge City, Kansas. He was observed by Trooper Jim Brooks of the Kansas Highway Patrol. Brooks stopped defendant in the parking lot of a local drinking establishment. Defendant was asked to exit his vehicle and to perform certain field sobriety tests.
Based on…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Sites v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- State v. BristorSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
- State v. McNaughtSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986
- Brosan v. CochranCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- State v. DegnanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.