Legal Opinion
Brosan v. Cochran
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided November 10, 1986No. 25, September Term, 1986PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, Chief Judge.
This case presents questions relating to the claimed constitutional right (1) of an individual apprehended for drunk driving to a face-to-face consultation with his attorney prior to deciding whether to submit to a police-administered breathalyzer test and (2) of an attorney to administer his own breathalyzer test to a drunk driving client, as part of his legal representation of the client, prior to advising him whether to submit to the State-administered sobriety test.
I
Maryland Code (1984 Repl.Vol.) § 16-205.1(a) of the Transportation Article provides that any person…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Dixon v. LoveSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- McAvoy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
- Hare v. Motor Vehicle AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- State v. FlansburgCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- Brank v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1987
- Najafi v. Motor Vehicle AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.