Legal Opinion
Steinagel v. Jacobson
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided November 4, 1980No. C-3-79-365PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ENTRY ON MOTIONS; PLAINTIFF GIVEN LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT; ACTION DEFERRED ON OTHER MOTIONS
RICE, District Judge.
The captioned cause came to be heard upon Defendants’ motion, seeking an Order of the Court: dismissing the Complaint for the reason that the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction or because venue is improper, pursuant to F.R.C.P. 12(b)(1), (3); or, alternatively, entering summary judgment in Defendants’ favor, pursuant to F.R.C.P. 56; or, alternatively, dismissing the Complaint as to the Defendant Raymond Jacobson for reason that he is not a proper party, pursuant…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Chapman v. Houston Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Lamont v. HaigCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- Gertrude McCall v. Bernard Shapiro, Commissioner, Connecticut Welfare DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- John H. Vandermolen v. John C. Stetson, Secretary of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Frank J. Konecny v. United States of America and Red Lake Drainage & Conservancy DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- 39 Fair empl.prac.cas. 162, 38 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 35,583 Eligio Castro and Rafael Diaz Diaz v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- Dr. Bhartur N. Premachandra v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
- Castro v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1984
- Lichtenfels v. OrrDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1984
- Premachandra v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1983