Legal Opinion
Castro v. United States
District Court, D. Puerto Rico
Decided April 6, 1984No. Civ. 83-3001(PG)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
PEREZ-GIMENEZ, District Judge.
This case has a long and convoluted history; the present amended complaint is the tenth in a series of suits, by one or both pro se plaintiffs, against the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”). 1 This and all previous actions appear to arise out of the FDIC’s failure to renew plaintiffs’ temporary appointments with the FDIC. Plaintiffs’ amended complaint is based on a variety of disparate. legal theories: The Federal Tort Claims Act; Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”); 42 U.S.C.…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Goss v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Sampson v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- 39 Fair empl.prac.cas. 162, 38 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 35,583 Eligio Castro and Rafael Diaz Diaz v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- Hernández-Mejías v. General ElectricDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2005
- Safir v. United States Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1985
- Franco-Rivera v. Chairman of Board of Directors of Federal Deposit InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1988
- Calesnick v. Redevelopment Authority of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.