Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Park Reservoir Co. v. Hinderlider

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 3, 1936No. 13,235PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

These parties appear here in the same order as in the trial court. We hereinafter refer to them as plaintiff and defendants.

Plaintiff has a decree for storage water for irrigation of date October 1, 1888. It takes its water from Surface Creek on which its reservoir is built. When spring floods have subsided the stream does not furnish sufficient water for direct irrigation for lands under ditches taking therefrom. The priorities of some of these antedate that of plaintiff, others are subsequent. The total capacity of all exceeds the creek flow, even in flood times, save when this is unusually…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Coffin v. Left Hand Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1882
  2. Webster v. LutherSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. People ex rel. Seeley v. MaySupreme Court of Colorado · 1885
  4. Comstock v. RamsaySupreme Court of Colorado · 1913
  5. Thomas v. GuiraudSupreme Court of Colorado · 1883

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Colorado Ass'n of Public Employees v. LammSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  2. Christmas v. CooleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1965
  3. State v. Southwestern Colorado Water Conservation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  4. Jones v. Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949
  5. Colorado Ass'n of Public Employees v. Board of RegentsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API