Legal Opinion

Matter of Haft

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 5, 1984PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report recommending that STEVEN P. HAFT of PARSIPPANY be publicly reprimanded for his violations of Disciplinary Rules arising out of his representation for the Office of the Public Defender of a defendant in a criminal appeal and that he be required to reimburse the Office of Attorney Ethics for appropriate administrative costs, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the report of the Disciplinary Review Board is hereby adopted and that STEVEN P. HAFT be and hereby is publicly reprimanded for his violation of DR 7-101(A)(1), DR…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re NigohosianSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  2. In Re VerdiramoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  3. In Re GoldstaubSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  4. In Re RosenthalSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  5. In Re GrinchisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Matter of SchwartzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  2. Matter of SmithSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  3. James F. Walters v. YmcaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2014
  4. In re RussellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  5. Matter of GillSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API