Legal Opinion

In Re Rosenthal

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 25, 1982PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Per curiam

Two clients have brought separate complaints against respondent, Richard Rosenthal, in connection with his handling of their cases. As a result of their complaints, both the District X Ethics Committee and the District XI Ethics Committee brought presentments against him. These presentments concern either neglect of the client’s case or failure to communicate with the client.

I

The Van Dunk Matter

The first complaint was brought by Elsie Van Dunk to the District X Ethics Committee. She was referred to Rosenthal’s office by another attorney following a fall on a sidewalk on October 13, 1974.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re GrinchisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
  2. In Re HoranSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Matter of HollendonnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  2. In Re GarberSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  3. Matter of SmithSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  4. Matter of JamesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  5. In Re KatzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API