Legal Opinion

In Re Goldstaub

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 16, 1982PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent, a member of the bar since 1960, has been the subject of some 30 ethical complaints during his professional career. From November 23, 1971 to November 14,1972, he was suspended from the practice of law for failing to respond to a consolidated statement of charges filed by the Hudson County Ethics Committee. The thread running through respondent’s ethical history is a failure to attend to his basic responsibilities to his clients, to the profession, and to this Court.

This disciplinary proceeding focuses upon respondent’s admitted failure to pursue diligently the interests of his…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re StoutSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Matter of NoonanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  2. Matter of TempletonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  3. Matter of SteinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  4. Matter of SchwartzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  5. In Re SeeligSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API