Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State v. . Riddle

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 26, 1947PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBarnhill, J.

The defendants, and others not in the appeal, were each separately indicted for the murder of Andrew Hoyle. Since the evidence related to the same transaction the indictments were consolidated and heard together. The two appealing defendants were convicted — Grant Riddle of murder in the second degree, and Emory Riddle of manslaughter.

There are over 40 assignments of error in the voluminous record, and, since a new trial must be granted, we follow the rule to omit discussion of those matters not likely to recur on another hearing.

The occurrence resulting in the death of Hoyle took place near…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. DooleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. State v. RummageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. People v. WalkerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
  4. State v. TannCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  5. State v. . ChurchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API