Legal Opinion

Quam v. Wulfekuhle

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 22, 1986No. C2-86-207PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NIERENGARTEN, Judge.

This appeal is from summary judgment in favor of judgment creditor respondent Hazel Quam. The trial court determined that Quam was entitled to full liability coverage for each of two vehicles involved in an automobile accident. We affirm.

FACTS

This case arises out of a three vehicle accident occurring on November 16, 1982 near Wendell, Minnesota. Respondent Hazel Quam was a passenger in a car driven by Robert Berg. The other two vehicles involved were owned by respondent Charles Wulfekuhle and insured under a combination policy issued by appellant Austin Mutual…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hilden v. Iowa National Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Malakowsky v. JohannsenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Makiesky v. National Guardian Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Royal Insurance Co. v. Western Casualty Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  2. Transamerica Insurance Company v. International Broadcasting CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
  3. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company v. National Real Estate Clearinghouse, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1997
  4. Transamerica Insurance v. International Broadcasting Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API