Legal Opinion

Malakowsky v. Johannsen

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 15, 1985No. C8-85-962PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FORSBERG, Judge.

Milwaukee Mutual Insurance Company appeals from a summary judgment entered for plaintiff. The trial court ruled that Milwaukee Mutual is estopped from asserting a policy exclusion against a third party. Milwaukee Mutual claims that a stranger to the contract cannot invoke estoppel and that estoppel cannot be used to enlarge coverage. We agree.

FACTS

Plaintiff-Respondent Ralph Malakowsky is a dairy farmer. On several occasions he purchased calves from defendants Raymond Johannsen and Raymond Koziolek, doing business as R & R Livestock. The complaint alleges that the last…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Shannon v. Great American Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Minnesota Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Iowa National Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Makiesky v. National Guardian Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  4. Moore v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Federal Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  2. Redeemer Covenant Church of Brooklyn Park v. Church Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
  3. In Re Silicone Implant Insurance Coverage LitigationCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
  4. Transamerica Insurance Company v. International Broadcasting CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
  5. GREAT WEST CAS. v. General Cas. Co. of WisconsinDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API