Malakowsky v. Johannsen
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FORSBERG, Judge.
Milwaukee Mutual Insurance Company appeals from a summary judgment entered for plaintiff. The trial court ruled that Milwaukee Mutual is estopped from asserting a policy exclusion against a third party. Milwaukee Mutual claims that a stranger to the contract cannot invoke estoppel and that estoppel cannot be used to enlarge coverage. We agree.
FACTS
Plaintiff-Respondent Ralph Malakowsky is a dairy farmer. On several occasions he purchased calves from defendants Raymond Johannsen and Raymond Koziolek, doing business as R & R Livestock. The complaint alleges that the last…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Shannon v. Great American Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Minnesota Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Iowa National Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Makiesky v. National Guardian Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Moore v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
3Cited by10 opinions
- Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Federal Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- Redeemer Covenant Church of Brooklyn Park v. Church Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- In Re Silicone Implant Insurance Coverage LitigationCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- Transamerica Insurance Company v. International Broadcasting CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- GREAT WEST CAS. v. General Cas. Co. of WisconsinDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.