Legal Opinion

Makiesky v. National Guardian Life Insurance

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 8, 1928No. 26,744PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.

Defendants appealed from an order denying their motion for a new trial.

Defendant insurance company on May 12,1925, through its agent, Epstein, issued a policy on the life of Abraham Makiesky for $1,000 payable to his wife, the plaintiff herein.

On September 8, 1925, Makiesky assigned the policy to Epstein as collateral security to a debt on which it is claimed $1,495.27 remains unpaid. The fact that he also assigned another policy of $2,000 is not here important.

A premium came due March 12,1927. Epstein asked for payment. Apparently plaintiff referred him to her son-in-law, Edward Leavitt, who…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pence v. ArbuckleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1876
  2. Plummer v. MoldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
  3. Western Land Ass'n v. BanksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  4. Schaefer v. NylinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  5. James v. WilderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1878

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Malakowsky v. JohannsenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  2. State v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  3. Quam v. WulfekuhleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  4. Dowd v. DowdIdaho Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API