Legal Opinion
Committee for Fairly Traded Venezuelan Cement v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided July 28, 2003No. SLIP OP. 03-95; Court 00-12-00547PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RIDGWAY, Judge.
In this action, Plaintiff Committee For Fairly Traded Venezuelan Cement (“Venezuelan Cement”) contests the five-year “sunset” review determination 1 of the United States International Trade Commission (“Commission”) that termination of the suspended antidumping and countervailing duty investigations of gray port-land cement and cement clinker 2 from Venezuela would not likely lead to the continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time. 3
For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs motion for judgment…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Committee for Fairly Traded Venezuelan Cement v. United States, and Cemex Venezuela, S.A.C.A. ("Vencemos")Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Committee for Fair Beam Imports v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007