Legal Opinion
Intrepid v. Mamie E. Pollock, District Director of Customs, and the United States of America
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided June 29, 1990No. 89-1468PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NIES, Chief Judge.
Intrepid appeals from the order of the United States Court of International Trade in Intrepid v. Pollock, 712 F.Supp. 212 (Ct.Int’l Trade 1989) (Tsoucalas, J.), denying its motions under 15(a) and (d) of the Rules of the Court of International Trade for leave to supplement and amend its complaint, and dismissing its action sua sponte. We reverse the rulings on the motions, vacate the judgment, and remand for proceedings on the merits.
I
Intrepid imported certain welded steel pipes (BS-1387) from Thailand into Puerto Rico between July 1987 and February 1988. Although not…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Frank H. Glatt v. Chicago Park District, Jim Halpern, and Robert NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Black v. Secretary Of Health And Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Furniture By Thurston v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Tyger Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.