United States v. Ranum
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
ADELMAN, District Judge.
On January 14, 2005, two days after the Supreme Court decided United States v. Booker, I had occasion to sentence defendant Mark Ranum, a loan officer convicted of misapplying bank funds. In order to impose sentence on Ranum, I had to carefully consider Booker’s directives to district courts. In this memorandum, I explain how I understand Booker and why I sentenced defendant Ranum to a year and a day in prison.
I. PRINCIPLES OF SENTENCING POST-BOOKER
In Booker, the Supreme Court held that Blakely v. Washington applied to the federal sentencing guidelines, and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wisconsin v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Everett D. SeacottCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- United States v. WilsonDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2005
- Maynard v. NygrenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- United States v. EmmeneggerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- United States v. Lavell DeanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. JimenezCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Galvez-BarriosDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2005
- United States v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2005
- United States v. PerryDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2005
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.