Legal Opinion

United States v. Ranum

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided January 19, 2005No. 2:04-cv-00031PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

ADELMAN, District Judge.

On January 14, 2005, two days after the Supreme Court decided United States v. Booker, I had occasion to sentence defendant Mark Ranum, a loan officer convicted of misapplying bank funds. In order to impose sentence on Ranum, I had to carefully consider Booker’s directives to district courts. In this memorandum, I explain how I understand Booker and why I sentenced defendant Ranum to a year and a day in prison.

I. PRINCIPLES OF SENTENCING POST-BOOKER

In Booker, the Supreme Court held that Blakely v. Washington applied to the federal sentencing guidelines, and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wisconsin v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. United States v. Everett D. SeacottCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  3. United States v. WilsonDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2005
  4. Maynard v. NygrenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  5. United States v. EmmeneggerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. United States v. Lavell DeanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  2. United States v. JimenezCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  3. United States v. Galvez-BarriosDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2005
  4. United States v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2005
  5. United States v. PerryDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2005

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API