Legal Opinion
United States v. Emmenegger
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 4, 2004No. 04 CR. 334(GEL)PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SENTENCING OPINION
LYNCH, District Judge.
The most pressing legal question in federal criminal law at this moment is whether the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Blakely v. Washington, — U.S. -, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), invalidates all or significant parts of the sentencing guidelines regime introduced by the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, Pub.L. No. 98-473, 98 Stat.1987. This Court has not yet been required to address that question. Either defense counsel or the Government, or both, have sought adjournments in cases pending sentence when the Supreme Court decided Blakely, and…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- United States v. RanumDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2005
- Baldessarre v. Monroe-Woodbury Central School DistrictDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- United States v. PimentalDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
- Piazza v. Florida Union Free School DistrictDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- United States v. DiazDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.