Legal Opinion

State v. Oglesby

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided August 24, 2007No. 683PA05PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRADY, Justice.

In this case we determine whether an incriminating statement made by a juvenile during a custodial interrogation must be suppressed at trial, pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7B-2101, when the juvenile had requested to telephone his aunt before making the statement. We hold that the statement need not be suppressed since defendant’s aunt was not a “guardian” for purposes of the relevant statute. Accordingly, we affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals in part. We also vacate and remand the decision of the Court of Appeals in part for further proceedings.

BACKGROUND

On 7 July 2003, the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. GolphinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  2. State v. RoacheSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  3. State v. GroomsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  4. State v. BlackwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
  5. State v. FincherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. State v. WaringSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2010
  2. State v. RaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2010
  3. State v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  4. State v. LedbetterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
  5. State v. RandolphCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API