Rutledge v. Bough
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtJeffrey W. Bates, J.
Shelly Rutledge and Carl Cox (hereinafter referred to collectively as Appellants and individually as Rutledge or Cox) filed an equitable garnishment action against National Casualty Company (NCC) pursu*885ant to § 379.200.1 As judgment creditors of Charles Bough (Bough), Appellants sought to collect insurance money from an NCC insurance policy to apply toward satisfaction of their judgments. NCC insured a 1991 Mercury Cougar (the Cougar) owned by Bough’s employer, Thompson Capital, Inc. (Thompson Capital). NCC denied that its policy provided any coverage, and the parties filed cross-motions for…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bradshaw v. DanielTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
- Halpin v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1992
- American Standard Insurance Co. v. HargraveSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000
- Mendenhall v. Property & Casualty Insurance Co. of HartfordSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
- Karscig v. McConvilleSupreme Court of Missouri · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Affirmative Insurance Co. v. BroekerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- SHELTER MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Respondent v. NICHOLE B. BEDELLMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
- O'Neal v. Argonaut Midwest Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- Beshears v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2015
- NATIONWIDE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA v. TANYA S. DUGGER and BILLY S. SWANSON, Defendants-RespondentsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.