Legal Opinion

Smith v. Hyne

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1919No. Docket No. 47PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Livingston; Collins (Joseph H.), J. Case by Elmer L. Smith, administrator of the estate of Arthur H. Smith, deceased, against Fred T. Hyne for the alleged negligent killing of plaintiff’s decedent. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.

On March 25, 1918, Arthur H. Smith, plaintiff s intestate, was instantly killed by a circular saw in front of which he fell while working as a setter in a small sawmill operated by defendant’s employees in the township of Brighton, Livingston county. Deceased was a married man 59 years of age living in the village of Brighton, his occupation being varied. At times he worked at painting and carpentering and at times did various other kinds of work at odd jobs as he found employment. Defendant lived in the village of Brighton where he had been engaged for many years as a dealer in grain,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lydman v. De HaasMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Munn v. Michigan State Telephone Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Smeester v. Pub-N-Grub, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Horn v. Parke, Davis & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Hipner v. StuartMichigan Supreme Court · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API