Legal Opinion

Hipner v. Stuart

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1922No. Docket No. 3Published

Error to Wayne; Collingwood (Charles B.), J., presiding. Case by John Hipner against Johnston Stuart for personal injuries. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

Plaintiff was á core maker employed by defendant. Too, he prepared and dampened the sand for the molds and when the metal was run from the cupola to the ladles and from thence to the molds he assisted in the foundry room. He was removing iron clamps from the molds after the metal had been poured. He testified that he inserted into the gate box of a mold the end of a cold rusty clamp and that an explosion followed, injuring him; that his purpose in so doing was to learn if the metal had cooled sufficiently for removal of the clamps; that defendant’s foreman had directed him so to do; and that…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Smith v. Peninsular Car WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Beaudry v. WatkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Clem v. Chalmers Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Hill v. Meyer Brothers' Drug Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1897
  5. Ribich v. Lake Superior Smelting Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1900

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API