Legal Opinion

People v. Knocke

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 19, 1928No. Docket No. 1705PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant by information was charged with five different offenses of grand theft on all of which counts the jury returned a verdict of guilty. He appeals from the judgments pronounced thereupon and also from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

In support of the appeal counsel assigns four grounds as follows: (1) Misconduct of the trial judge consisting of asserted prejudicial and improper remarks during the course of the trial; (2) errors in the admission and exclusion of evidence; (3) insufficient evidence to support the conviction, including the argument that there is no…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. BoggessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. People v. CordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  3. People v. HarringtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. People v. WhitakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  5. People v. ReidCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Goldstein v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
  2. People v. ChearyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Hughes v. QuackenbushCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. United States v. RedfieldDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1961
  5. People v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API