People v. Wilson
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtHouser, J.
From a judgment following his conviction on each of two counts in an information wherein he was charged with the commission of the crime of robbery, and from an order by which his motion for a new trial was denied, defendant has appealed to this court.
Although on the trial of the action defendant was identified by the sole victim in each of the robberies as the person who committed the crime, by the testimony of each of several apparently reputable witnesses it was made to appear that at the time when such robbery was committed defendant could not have been present thereat; in other words,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People v. Wong LoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- People v. Fong Ah SingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- People v. SchmidtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- People v. ViscontiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
- People v. LeddyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- People v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. SearsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- People v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- People v. GuzmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- People v. GranadosCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.