Legal Opinion · Dissent

State Ex Rel. Robinson v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 2014No. 2012-1827Published

1DissentO’Neill, J.

{¶ 26} I dissent from the majority’s holding in this case. It is time for this court to restate its support for the Ohio Workers’ Compensation Act and its fundamental proposition that injuries in the workplace are to be evaluated on a no-fault basis.

{¶ 27} As demonstrated in this case and in State ex rel. Cline v. Abke Trucking, Inc., 137 Ohio St.3d 557, 2013-Ohio-5159, 1 N.E.3d 409, the Industrial Commission continues to ignore the fundamental principle that the concept of fault has no place in Ohio’s system of workers’ compensation. The commission abused its discretion by denying Shelby…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Blankenship v. Cincinnati Milacron Chemicals, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State ex rel. Ashcraft v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State ex rel. Louisiana-Pacific Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1924
  5. State ex rel. Cline v. Abke Trucking, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API