Legal Opinion
Weilburg v. Shapiro
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 31, 2007No. 05-15540PublishedCited by 153 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COVELLO, District Judge.
This is an appeal of the district court’s sua sponte dismissal of an action for damages brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“section 1983”). 1 The pro se plaintiffs, Daro Weilburg and Maria Weilburg (“Weilburgs”), allege that the State of Arizona and various officials in Yavapai County, Arizona, extradited Daro Weilburg from Arizona to Illinois in violation of state and federal statutes, thereby violating Daro Weilburg’s right to procedural due process.
The issue presented is whether the United States Supreme Court’s ruling in Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 114 S.Ct.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Harry Franklin v. Ms. Murphy and Hoyt CuppCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Herman Resnick v. Warden Hayes Lt. Ernst Officer Myers (Dho) Counselor Aune Officer WadeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by153 opinions
- Powers v. Hamilton County Public Defender CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Barrett v. BellequeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Weilburg v. ShapiroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Rouse v. United States Department of StateCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Robinson v. Alameda CountyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2012
148 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.