Legal Opinion
Rouse v. United States Department of State
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 22, 2009No. 06-15967PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDEg AMENDING OPINION AN® AMENDED OPINION
ORDER
I
The opinion filed in this case on November 24, 2008, 548 F.3d 871, is amended as follow:
At page 15723, 548 F.3d at 876, of the slip opinion, line 23, after the sentence concluding < accuracy and access claims. > delete the remainder of the language in that Part and replace with discussion, however, is limited to his accuracy claims.
Because Rouse concedes that he received a copy of his full embassy file, his access claims are moot. 1
We review the district court’s dismissal of Rouse’s claims de novo, see Weber v. Dep’t of Veterans Affairs, 521…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Alexander v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Block v. North Dakota Ex Rel. Board of University & School LandsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Kwai Wong v. David BeebeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- North County Communications Corp. v. California Catalog & TechnologyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Jorge Rojas v. FaaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Boyd v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2013
- Shearson v. HolderDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2011
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.