Legal Opinion

Native Village of Venetie I.R.A. Council v. Alaska

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 12, 1991No. 88-3929PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The opinion reported at 918 F.2d 797 (9th Cir.1990) is hereby withdrawn, and the attached opinion filed in its stead. With this amended opinion, the plaintiffs-appellants’ petition for rehearing is denied.

OPINION

O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:

We must decide whether federal law requires the state of Alaska to accord “full faith and credit” to child-custody determinations made by the tribal courts of native villages.

I

The native villages of Venetie and Fort Yukon lie on or above the Arctic Circle in Alaska’s frozen tundra. Venetie has a population of 132, according to the 1980 census, all but…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Green v. MansourSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. HolyfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. United States v. WheelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Pit River Home & Agricultural Cooperative Ass'n v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  2. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Karuk Tribe Housing Authority, OpinionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  3. Becker v. OregonDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2001
  4. Doe v. MannDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2003
  5. Native Village of Tyonek v. PuckettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API