Legal Opinion

United Glass And Ceramic Workers Of North America, Afl-Cio v. F. Ray Marshall

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 8, 1978No. 76-1982PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

584 F.2d 398

189 U.S.App.D.C. 240

UNITED GLASS AND CERAMIC WORKERS OF NORTH AMERICA, AFL-CIO,

Glass Bottle Blowers Association of the United

States and Canada, AFL-CIO, and Stone,

Glass and Clay Coordinating

Committee, Petitioners,

v.

F. Ray MARSHALL, Secretary of Labor, and James D. Hoover,

Acting Executive Assistant to the Deputy Under

Secretary, Respondents.

No. 76-1982.

United States Court of Appeals,

District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued Nov. 1, 1977.

Decided June 8, 1978.

Eugene L. Stewart, Washington, D. C., with whom Daniel Rooney, Washington, D. C., was on brief, for petitioners.

John R. Garson,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Uaw v. F. Ray MarshallCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
  2. Groesbeck v. Duluth, South Shore & Atlantic Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. Hazel Paden v. U. S. Department of Labor and the Secretary of the Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
  4. United Glass & Ceramic Workers of North America v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Woodrum v. DonovanUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
  2. Estate of Finkel v. DonovanUnited States Court of International Trade · 1985
  3. Stidham v. United States Department of LaborUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
  4. Cherlin v. DonovanUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
  5. Robert W. Pemberton v. F. Ray Marshall, Secretary, Department of Labor, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API