Legal Opinion

United Glass & Ceramic Workers of North America v. Marshall

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 8, 1978No. 76-1982PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by

LEVEN-THAL, Circuit Judge.

Like UAW v. Marshall, 189 U.S.App.D.C. 232, 584 F.2d 390 (1978), also decided today, this case involves a challenge to a decision of the Secretary of Labor denying a request for certification for worker adjustment assistance under the Trade Act of 1974. At issue is interpretation of the phrase “contributed importantly” as used in § 222(3) of the Trade Act. That subsection states:

The Secretary shall certify a group of workers as eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under this part if he determines—(3) that increases of imports of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Uaw v. F. Ray MarshallCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
  2. Groesbeck v. Duluth, South Shore & Atlantic Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. Hazel Paden v. U. S. Department of Labor and the Secretary of the Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Former Employees of CSX Oil and Gas Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989
  2. United Glass And Ceramic Workers Of North America, Afl-Cio v. F. Ray MarshallCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
  3. Former Employees of Shaw Pipe, Inc. v. U.S. Secretary of LaborUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
  4. Former Employees of Shaw Pipe, Inc. v. United States Secretary of LaborUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
  5. Kelley v. Secretary, U.S. Department of LaborUnited States Court of International Trade · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API