United Glass & Ceramic Workers of North America v. Marshall
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by
LEVEN-THAL, Circuit Judge.
Like UAW v. Marshall, 189 U.S.App.D.C. 232, 584 F.2d 390 (1978), also decided today, this case involves a challenge to a decision of the Secretary of Labor denying a request for certification for worker adjustment assistance under the Trade Act of 1974. At issue is interpretation of the phrase “contributed importantly” as used in § 222(3) of the Trade Act. That subsection states:
The Secretary shall certify a group of workers as eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under this part if he determines—(3) that increases of imports of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Uaw v. F. Ray MarshallCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- Groesbeck v. Duluth, South Shore & Atlantic Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Hazel Paden v. U. S. Department of Labor and the Secretary of the Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
3Cited by9 opinions
- Former Employees of CSX Oil and Gas Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989
- United Glass And Ceramic Workers Of North America, Afl-Cio v. F. Ray MarshallCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- Former Employees of Shaw Pipe, Inc. v. U.S. Secretary of LaborUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
- Former Employees of Shaw Pipe, Inc. v. United States Secretary of LaborUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
- Kelley v. Secretary, U.S. Department of LaborUnited States Court of International Trade · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.